Sunday, January 16, 2011

Should pornography be restricted by law?

I believe that the only restrictions that should be put on pornography should be when the content is involving somebody underage, somebody being raped or maimed, or any other content that goes against human or animal rights. People very often try and seemingly never succeed to put restrictions on human nature and I feel like the back fire to that is worst than the act itself. There have been many examples of this that I have seen. One scenario that exemplifies this is when a very religious person such as a priest is suppressing his sexuality to such a degree and for such a long time that he RAPES or molests young alter boys. The question you have to ask is, "would him watching consensual sex via pornography or having consensual sex with an adult  really be worse than that?" My answer is absolutely and unequivocally NO.

No comments:

Post a Comment